Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention

Usernames for administrator attention

This page is intended for reports of usernames that are blatant and serious violations of the username policy requiring an immediate block. Reports will be assessed in accordance with the username policy, the UAA instructions, and the following bullet points. Please ensure you are familiar with the assessment criteria before making a report. Except in the instance of an egregious name violation, please do not report accounts with no edits or those who have not edited in the preceding 2 weeks. Real names are permitted, except when the editor implies they are someone other than themselves, such as impersonating a notable living person. Promotional names require evidence to be blocked. Do not report a username merely because it "appears" promotional. For libellous usernames or usernames that contain another editor's nonpublic personal information, please contact an oversighter and do not report it here. Discuss less-serious violations with the user on their talk page so that they can rename or abandon their account in good faith. Templates such as {{Uw-username}} or {{Uw-coi-username}} may be used. If, after discussion with a user, the problem still seems unresolved, a username request for comment may be in order. Do not leave a username warning on a user's talk page and also immediately report them here. Do one or the other, and not both simultaneously. Patrollers are asked to remove reports that have been declined, are bot-reported false positives or are otherwise non-blatant or stale reports. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Note: Patrollers may wish to monitor usernames flagged by filters 54, 148 and 149; private filters 102, 354, 499, 579; and this recent changes filter tag.

This page was last updated at 09:35 on 30 October 2024 (UTC). if it is out of date.

User-reported

• Eptech.jung (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username (look at their contributions page). One of their edits explains a company, and their username represents that company. [1] ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 09:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

  This might be Yung from Eptech. We allow names like that, it's just COI. Secretlondon (talk) 09:21, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

• James Sceats (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. User:James Sceats. -Lemonaka 01:11, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

  Not a violation of the username policy. Nobody will be confused by a username that's the same as someone who died in 1903. Cullen328 (talk) 01:19, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

• Artriumjournal (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 01:20, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

  It looks like WP:PAID editing but I cannot see any edits mentioning their username. Secretlondon (talk) 09:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

• Avril Lavigne PR department (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Username implies shared use. TornadoLGS (talk) 02:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

  Being discussed with the user. Given there doesn't seem to be any relationship between their edits and their username, I'm assuming that the username is a joke, and hopefully we can get them to request a change without a block. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 05:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)