Jump to content

Wikipedia:No episcopal threats

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Johann Otto von Gemmingen, Prince-Bishop of Augsburg in Bavaria (1591–1598). Aside from being dead for several centuries, he's not going to help you with any disputes on Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, it is inevitable: a change you make gets reverted, a piece of content you've added is contested, or really any mishap involving your contributions happens. In any case, it's of paramount importance that you stay cool, be civil, and conduct yourself properly in order to resolve the issue in the right fashion. Among the ways to bungle this orderly process are by making personal attacks, casting aspersions, and being just tone-deaf to the consensus.

There is one course of action of misconduct that takes the cake from anything else. It is wholly unacceptable on the English Wikipedia (and on Mulberry Street, to think that you'd see it there) to get the bishops involved. For goodness sakes', if the bishops get involved, the world may implode. The apocalypse is liable to start. McDonald's ice cream machines may start functioning properly. Dr. Doofenshmirtz may finally take over the tri-state AREA!!!!!!!

    The mere thought of getting the bishops involved is just too much to bear.

List

[edit]

There are a few ways that bishops may serve as a detriment to Wikipedia when unduly called upon, so in a flagrant middle-finger to Wikipedia:Don't stuff beans up your nose, a list is provided below which details the many ways that getting the bishops involved on Wikipedia can (and will) go wrong.

  • Contacting the bishop of a Wikipedia editor who happens to be a member of the clergy, in order to rat them out for nominating your favorite YouTuber's article for deletion. This is like to just make the YouTuber look bad, and will end you up banned from their Twitch chat when they livestream.
  • The bishops are called as artillery offences to support an AfD vote. (keep that weird, maybe-notable-if-we-did-a-Google-search article out of sight from the internet-connected anglosphere!)
  • A new Keanu Reeves movie has come out, and you've caught your Wikipedia editor-niece editing his page. Disapproving of his violent action franchise, you have enlisted a bishop and their diocese to mediate her activities on-wiki. This is only going to waste the church's time and make your niece hate you.
  • Ric Flair has had his umpteenth "final match". Vandals are drawn by the media attention and are vandalising his page. You decide to enlist an eparchy led by a bishop to bless Flair's page. This is not like to actually help any vandalism-combative efforts—this blessing may actually be misdirected at the vandals, and we don't want that. If this happens, even if unintentionally; the user, the bishop and his participating unit will be sentenced to 57 slaps with a wet trout each, and an evening in the village stocks.


No bishops acting as Howitzers, no bishops advocating against violence in film, and no bishops blessing pro wrestlers. For the latter, keep that activity off-wiki.


Other direct nuisances

[edit]

Cautionary note

[edit]
St Nicholas preferring the argument of force to the force of argument

The story of St Nicholas punching Arius' lights out at the First Council of Nicaea is generally thought to be apocryphal and may not be used as precedent.

See also

[edit]
[edit]